Most
peacebuilding happens once conflict – i.e. major, large-scale violence – has ended. But some
peacebuilding tasks can start even during conflict. For example, in pockets of peace,
civil society organizations, local government or traditional actors may be promoting
conflict resolution mechanisms, or seeking to provide basic services or develop livelihood opportunities. The
United Nations can support them. It is important to
start assessing capacity as soon as the end of conflict is in sight (particularly national capacity, but also other potentially useful capacity in the country or the region, such as resident staff or NGOs). This preparatory groundwork enables the
United Nations to respond more quickly and effectively once a negotiated settlement has been reached and/or elements of peace are established, as well as to
capitalize on any opportunities to build peace from the bottom up where pockets of stability exist. At that point, the volume of
peacebuilding action is expected to ramp up significantly. In this early period, people are ready for change, have high expectations and can easily revert to conflict if they do not feel tangible benefits from peace. However, this is where the international community has been weakest (hence the emphasis in the Secretary-General’s report on the crucial window of the first 24 months after conflict). Seizing this early window of opportunity is vital. But
peacebuilding is a lengthy process, which goes
far beyond this initial two year period. A country’s
peacebuilding priorities and needs will change
over time. The UN may be expected to play a more
prominent role in the early days, while national
capacity is being developed and
national actors
may need considerable external support, and when
a
transitional government’s legitimacy may be weak
prior to the first post-conflict elections
Comments
Post a Comment